Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Fukushima. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Fukushima. Mostrar todas las entradas

martes, 30 de julio de 2013

"La Conspiración Anti Tabaco" - Podcast 2 Para las 2

La verdad más allá de esta supuesta "REALIDAD IMPUESTA" a base de repeticiones de una mentira, hasta implantarla en las mentes de millones de personas que NO CUESTIONAN, y menos utilizan el pensamiento crítico, para entender que INTERESES hay detrás de esta realidad.

Antes de que Rusia, Inglaterra y Norteamérica prohibieran los tests atmosféricos el 5 de agosto de 1963, más de 4.200 kg de plutonio habían ya caído de la atmósfera.
Sabiendo que menos de un microgramo (millonésima parte y un gramo) de plutonio inhalado causa cáncer terminal de pulmón en el humano, sabemos que sus queridos gobiernos han arrojado 4.200.000.000 (4.2 mil millones) de dosis letales a la atmósfera, con una vida media de la partícula radioactiva de 50.000 años.
Desafortunadamente el asunto se pone peor. El plutonio mencionado más arriba existe en el armamento nuclear actual antes de la detonación, pero por lejos el mayor número de mortales partículas relativas son esas derivadas de la basura común o arena absorbida del suelo, e irradiada a esta viajando verticalmente a través de la bola de fuego del arma.Esa partículas forman holgadamente la mayor parte del “humo” en cualquier foto de una detonación nuclear atmosférica. En muchos casos varias toneladas material son absorbidos y permanentemente irradiados en tránsito, pero seamos increíblemente conservadores y afirmemos que solamente 1000 kilos de material de superficie es chupado en cada test nuclear atmosférico.Antes de ser prohibido por Rusia, Inglaterra y Norteamérica, se realizaron un total de 711 test nucleares atmosféricos, por consiguiente creando 711,000 kilos de mortales microscópicas partículas radioactivas, a las cuales deben ser agregados los 4200 kilos originales de las mismas armas, para un aproximado pero muy conservador total de 715,200 kilogramos.

A quién o a qué le echarían la culpa de un padecimiento como el cáncer pulmonar?

Cuándo se habla de que:

Hay más de un millón de dosis letales por kilogramo, significando que su gobierno ha contaminado su atmósfera con más de 715,000,000,000 [715 mil millones] de tales dosis, suficiente para causar cáncer de pulmón o cáncer de piel 117 veces en cada hombre, mujer o niño en la tierra.






La Conspiración Anti Tabaco

                              Podcast 2 Para las 2 










miércoles, 23 de marzo de 2011

Scientist Leuren Moret - Japan earthquake and nuclear "accident" are tec...



Independent scientist Leuren Moret, whose 2004 landmark article in the Japan Times unmasked lies and distortions by government and company officials that led to the construction of nuclear power plants in seismically dangerous areas, has declared in an exclusive 65-minute video interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre that the "Japan earthquake and "accidents" at the Fukushima's 6 nuclear power plant units starting March 11, 2011 are in fact deliberate acts of tectonic nuclear warfare, carried out against the populations ecology of Japan and the nations of the Northern Hemisphere, including the U.S., Canada, and Mexico.

jueves, 17 de marzo de 2011

All about MOX fuel and reactor grade PLUTONIUM and URANIUM

"MOX" LA PALABRA DEL DIA EN FUKUSHIMA, UNA PÉSIMA NOTICIA PARA EL MUNDO ENTERO.




With four busted reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi site, engineers and rescue workers have plenty to do just to keep all their plates spinning. But over the past few days, there always seems to be one reactor causing them more headaches than others. Yesterday it was reactor 4, with its coolant pool  empty of water and the spent fuel rods stored there emitting massive waves of gamma radiation.
Today it's rector 3. The day began—at least in the West—with images of helicopters flying over the reactor building, dumping seven-ton loads of water in an attempt both to cool the containment vessel and prevent that storage pool from drying up as well. But what makes reactor 3 so special? In one acronymic word: MOX.
All of the fuel rods in all of the other reactors are made essentially of uranium with a zirconium cladding to seal in radioactive emissions. Reactor 4 uses something different. Its fuel rod are only 94% uranium, with 6% plutonium stirred in and then the same zirconium shell. This mixed oxide (hence the MOX moniker) formulation has one advantage—and a number of disadvantages.
The advantage—no surprise—is money. Plutonium is a natural byproduct of radioactive decay and spent fuel rods are thus full of the stuff. You can always put them into long term storage for a few dozen millennia—which is where most spent rods have to go–but you can also reprocess some of the waste and combine it with pricier uranium for a cheaper and still energy-intensive rod. With nuclear power still more expensive than fossil fuels like coal, manufacturers need to save where they can to remain competitive, and MOX is a good budget cutter.
But MOX is also temperamental. Physicist Arjun Makhijani, president of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Research in Takma Park, MD., spoke to TIME earlier in the week and heaped scorn on the Mark 1 reactors used at the Daiichi site. His criticism in that conversation was the comparatively flimsy (by nuclear reactor standards at least) containment vessels used in the Mark 1s. But he's no fan of the use of MOX either.
"This sort of fuel is more difficult to control than uranium fuel," he told the Augusta Chronicle. "The risk of accidental criticality are different. You have the same kinds of problems, they are just more intense with plutonium."


What Makhijani means by "accidental criticality," of course, is that the stuff just combusts more easily. That's particularly dangerous in a Mark 1, according to some studies. A report by the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, for example, found that in the event of a core meltdown, a Mark 1's containment vessel has a 42% chance of failing—a whole lot closer to a coin flip than you want with something like a nuclear reactor
And when plutonium is dispersed into the wind you want to be pretty much anywhere else.

As I reported last week, there are four kidns of carcinogenic isotopes released when a nuke plant blows: iodine-131, cesium-137, strontium-90 and  plutonium-239.

Plutonium is not only the most lethal of the four ("extrordinarily toxic" is how Dr. Ira Helfand, a board member for Physicians for Social Responsibility, describes it), it also hangs around the longest.

It's half life is a whopping 24,000 years, and since radioactive contamination is dangerous for 10 to 20 times the length of the isotope's half.life, that means plutonium emitted in Fukushima today will still be around in close to half a million years.

 http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/03/17/mox-the-fukushima-word-of-the-day-and-why-its-bad-news/#ixzz1GtvLMpoF

miércoles, 16 de marzo de 2011

ALERTA UNAM SOBRE EVOLUCION NUCLEAR EN JAPON: Epifanio Cruz Zaragoza

Boletín UNAM-DGCS-151
Ciudad Universitaria.
06:00 hrs. 15 de marzo de 2011

Epifanio Cruz Zaragoza

EL MUNDO DEBE ESTAR ALERTA A LA EVOLUCIÓN NUCLEAR EN JAPÓN: EPIFANIO CRUZ ZARAGOZA

• El incidente más riesgoso en la planta de Fukushima, ocurriría si las altas temperaturas fundieran uranio, plutonio y alfa, dijo el investigador del Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares de la UNAM
• Corrientes de aire caliente pueden transportar residuos peligrosos hacia áreas muy lejanas, añadió
Masas de aire, aguas marítimas o productos comestibles servirían de vehículo transportador para que partículas contaminantes radioactivas, emanadas de los reactores de la planta de Fukushima, Japón, alcancen de manera indirecta a varios países, advirtió el coordinador de Irradiación y Seguridad Radiológica del Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares (ICN) de la UNAM, Epifanio Cruz Zaragoza.
El experto explicó que el incidente más riesgoso ocurriría si las altas temperaturas ocasionaran la fundición de uranio, plutonio y alfa, y ese líquido, al hacer contacto con el núcleo del reactor, provocara una explosión y la emanación de elementos radioactivos potencialmente nocivos para la salud.
Parte de ese material, en forma de gas o de partículas muy finas, sería lanzado a la atmósfera como si fuera ceniza, en una suerte de efecto chimenea. De acuerdo a las condiciones climatológicas, se podrían dispersar hacia grandes áreas porque el aire caliente puede transportar esos residuos, añadió.
El especialista indicó que si de las explosiones que hasta ahora se han producido emanan de los reactores sólo hidrógeno o yodo, la salud de los lugareños estaría a salvo si son evacuados al menos a 20 kilómetros de distancia, apuntó.
Cruz Zaragoza instó a tomar conciencia, porque el mayor riesgo que implican explosiones de esta naturaleza es la toma de decisiones. Por ejemplo, si se compran productos contaminados, sería muy perjudicial, precisó.
Estados Unidos y Canadá ya “prendieron sus alarmas” al empezar el monitoreo de partículas suspendidas.

El coordinador de Irradiación y Seguridad Radiológica dijo que las autoridades niponas no imaginaron que los diques de seis metros y medio de altura, colocados alrededor de las plantas nucleares para protegerlas del oleaje, fueran insuficientes ante la presencia de marejadas de 10 metros de altura.











http://www.dgcs.unam.mx/boletin/bdboletin/2011_151.html

martes, 15 de marzo de 2011

Underground information on what's happening at Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan - a dirty bomb waiting to go off


(NaturalNews) NaturalNews has received information directly from an American who happened to be in Tokyo at the time of the nuclear incident and who also happens to have a background in atomic energy and nuclear reactors. He has sent us some extremely disturbing information that seems to indicate the situation with the reactors in Japan is far, far worse than what the conventional media is describing. We are not releasing this individual's name for obvious reasons (he's still in Tokyo and virtually unreachable), but he is an individual who is known to me personally and with whom I have spent a considerable number of hours over a period of two years. He is a very high-integrity individual and someone who is also extremely well connected in the world of advanced medicine.

In an email sent from Tokyo, this individual explains:

"...nuclear reactors use bundles of enriched uranium packed into stainless steel fuel rods in order to generate the heat that drives the turbines. You need to keep these bundles of pins cool otherwise they melt or burst.

Now, it seems the Fukushima power plant pulled spent fuel bundles (a collection of fuel rods) and stored them on site rather than shipping them to another location. Speculation is that in addition to the fires that are damaging the working reactor, these storage areas of their spent fuel bundles could [now] be on fire. This vastly compounds the problem of any meltdown, as this spent fuel will add to the contamination [because] it is extremely toxic.

In other words, as well as dealing with a potential meltdown, you also have the toxic products from the depleted fuel pins adding to the pollution. This is extraordinarily bad. The spent fuel bundles should have been relocated away from the reactor core a long, long time ago. Given the earthquake realities of Japan, these reactor building were basically dirty bombs waiting to be set off by a [natural] disaster."


I want to thank this individual for his continued reporting from Tokyo and assure him that if he chooses to send more information to NaturalNews, we will of course continue to protect his anonymity.

Nuclear plant becomes dirty bomb waiting to go off


The upshot of his assessment of the situation is that the Fukushima power plant is now a "dirty bomb" waiting to happen. And it's on fire right now. Radiation levels are rising so rapidly that it's not even safe to work near the plant. This is very rapidly headed into a situation where suicidal volunteers are going to have to "rush in" and do some work on the plant, spend only a few minutes there, then evacuate as quickly as possible. And they'll still get cancer.

This is exactly what happened in Chernobyl following the accident there in 1987. Hundreds of brave volunteers basically committed suicide in order to erect the containment vessel over the melted-down reactor and thereby prevent further radiation from escaping directly into the environment.

As Wikipedia explains (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherno...):

"The worst of the radioactive debris was collected inside what was left of the reactor, much of it shoveled in by liquidators wearing heavy protective gear (dubbed "bio-robots" by the military); these workers could only spend a maximum of 40 seconds at a time working on the rooftops of the surrounding buildings because of the extremely high doses of radiation given off by the blocks of graphite and other debris. The reactor itself was covered with bags containing sand, lead, and boric acid dropped from helicopters (some 5,000 metric tons during the week following the accident). By December 1986 a large concrete sarcophagus had been erected, to seal off the reactor and its contents. Many of the vehicles used by the "liquidators" remain parked in a field in the Chernobyl area to this day, most giving off doses of 10-30 R/h (0.7-2 uA/kg) over 25 years after the disaster."

Far worse than a terrorism attack

This could be very similar to what we're headed toward in Japan if the people there don't get this situation under control very quickly. Terrorists couldn't have carried out a more deadly disaster than what the "scientific" nuclear power industry has now delivered to the people of Japan.

In the name of scientific progress, the Japanese people are now threatened with the worst kind of death: Death by radiation poisoning -- a slow, suffering breakdown of cellular function at every level. And sadly, Japan has already suffered through a similar scenario near the end of World War II when the United States of America dropped atomic bombs on the civilian Japanese population... twice!

What frightens me in all this is the choice of words from our source who describes the Fukushima site as a "dirty bomb" just waiting to go off. There's a lesson in all this, of course: When you play God with the planet, it might be wise to follow the precautionary principle more closely. This nuclear catastrophe is a mirror image of what we're likely to see in the future of agriculture due to GMOs (genetically engineered seeds). GE seeds are the "genetic dirty bombs" of agriculture, and they too could devastate human civilization in much the same way that nuclear power now threatens the very survival of an entire nation.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

But too many "scientists" are infinitely arrogant, it seems, and they rarely consider the consequences of their dangerous actions. On all the issues that matter -- GMOs and seeds, synthetic chemicals, cell phone radiation, nuclear power, fluoride in the water, mercury fillings and much more -- "science" has delivered suffering and death, not lasting progress. Thanks to these scientists who convince governments to take on nuclear power, GMOs, vaccines or pharmaceuticals, our world is now facing a multi-faceted life extinction crisis that threatens the very future of life on our planet. And Bill Gates thinks the answer is "more vaccines!" (Insane? You betcha...)

The lessons to be learned from Fukushima are the same lessons humanity needs to learn on many other fronts: Don't think you are so brilliant that you can outsmart Mother Nature and the laws of cause and effect. "Science" is no panacea. Science makes too many promises that it cannot keep (Improved crop yields! Clean energy! Amazing vaccines!), and when nations embrace these so-called "scientific" solutions, ultimately they only receive death, fear and financial destruction.

For instance, the pharmaceutical industry has done to the U.S. economy what the Fukushima power plant is about to do to Japan. The promises we were given in the name of science and medicine have all blown up in our faces, leaving only a desolate landscape of destruction and misery in their wake.

It is time we all began to seriously question our "faith" in the false promises of science and instead started to look at more holistic and humble solutions for sustainable life on our planet.

The Amish way of life, for example, may not look high-tech and cool, but it doesn't explode in your face and irradiate your whole country, either. And the Amish do just fine without vaccines, too (and they have near-zero rates of autism, by the way).

THE DANGERS OF RADIATION

The risks of radiation on the human body
The risks of radiation on the human body
The Japanese authorities say the radiation levels from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant could now post a potential health risk. Here we look at the health risks...

Why is the radiation dangerous?
Ionising radiation poses a threat to human health because it can damage human cells at the molecular level and disrupt the body's natural control processes. Moderate exposure can increase the risk of cancer, while high levels this can cause widespread organ failure.

What is a dangerous dose?
A radiation dose is expressed in units of Sievert (Sv). On average, a person is exposed to approximately 3.0 mSv/year, most of which is due to natural sources such as cosmic rays.
The readings at the Fukushima site rose beyond safe limits - 400 millisieverts per hour (mSv/hr), after a third explosion last night. So far nearly 200 people have been taken to hospital with suspected exposure
According to the World Nuclear Authority a radiation dose of 100mSV a year is the lowest level at which any increased risk of cancer is evident.
A cumulative dose of 1,000 millisieverts would increase the incidence of fatal cancer by about five per cent.
A single 1,000 mSv dose causes radiation sickness such as nausea but not death. A single dose of 5,000 mSv would kill about half of those exposed to it within a month.
However, Lam Ching-wan from the University of Hong Kong said: 'Very acute radiation, like that which happened in Chernobyl and to the Japanese workers at the nuclear power station, is unlikely for the population.'
Tokyo reported slightly elevated radiation levels, but officials said the increase was too small to threaten the 39 million people in and around the capital.

What are the symptoms?
Moderate exposure to the radiation will cause symptoms including vomiting, diarrhoea and headaches. It also raises the risk of cancer in the long-term.
High levels of radiation also causes radiation burns, hair loss and potentially fatal damage to internal organs.

How is it treated?
Further contamination is reduced by removing clothes and shoes, and washing the skin with soap and water.
Drugs can increase white blood-cell production to counter any damage that may have occurred to the bone marrow. Potassium iodine tablets before radiation exposure can stop the radioactive iodine from lodging in the thyroid.
A dye known as Prussian blue can also be used to remove certain radioactive materials from the body.

How has the Japanese Government responded?

People living within 18 miles of the plant have been evacuated or urged to stay indoors and make their homes airtight.
They have also distributed 230,000 units of stable iodine to evacuation centres from the area around Fukushima Daiichi and Fukushima Daini nuclear power plants as a precaution. The tablets block radioactive iodine from being taken into the thyroid gland, protecting it from damage and potential cancer.
The 70 workers working to safeguard the nuclear complex are all wearing p


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1366308/Japan-earthquake-tsunami-Meltdown-3rd-reactor-blast-hits-nuclear-plant.html#ixzz1Gjp6smMa

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/031718_nuclear_power_dirty_bomb.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter#ixzz1Gjmi4PLG